- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 “问题―解决办法”美容广告语篇模式中的态度资源    

姓名:

 付珊    

学号:

 1049721202598    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 eng    

学科代码:

 050211    

学科名称:

 外国语言学及应用语言学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 文学硕士    

学校:

 武汉理工大学    

院系:

 外国语学院    

专业:

 外国语言学及应用语言学    

研究方向:

 系统功能语言学    

第一导师姓名:

 柯建华    

第一导师院系:

 武汉理工大学    

完成日期:

 2014-09-10    

答辩日期:

 2014-12-16    

中文关键词:

 语篇模式 ; 美容广告 ; 问题-解决型模式 ; 评价理论 ; 态度资源    

中文摘要:

    作为交际单位的语篇,它是按照一定的思维模式组织起来的。由于语篇模式是语义内容的反映,所以不同的语篇模式反映不同的语义内容。伴随着大众传媒的迅速发展,广告语篇已经受到越来越多语言学者的关注,并成为一个日益重要的研究领域。黄国文在他的《语篇分析的理论与实践-广告语篇研究》一书中探讨了“问题-解决办法”的语篇模式,并发现在研究广告的语篇模式,很多美容广告的语篇结构都属于“问题-解决办法”模式。评价理论是功能语言学在对人际意义的研究中发展起来的新词汇-语法框架,它关注语篇中可以协商的各种态度。评价理论由三个子系统组成,即态度系统、介入系统、和极差系统,其中态度系统是主体,包括三个次子系统:情感、判断和鉴赏。

    本文从评价理论的态度系统角度分析“问题-解决办法”美容广告语篇模式中态度资源在两个部分的分布特征和实现方式,探讨广告商是如何利用态度资源诱发潜在消费者购买欲望,促成购买,从而实现盈利的目标。本文的语料来源于四种英美主流时尚杂上的40篇美容广告,基于Systemic Corder, 本文发现:(1)美容广告大量使用态度资源以达到劝说的目的,进而促使消费者的购买行为。 在“问题”部分,情感资源所占比重(49.7%)最大,其次是鉴赏资源(40.0%)和判断资源(10.3%);(2)否定的情感资源在“问题”部分占主导地位,目的是为后文的“方法”部分做铺垫;(3)“问题”部分的情感资源主要是由动词实现的;(4)在“方法”部分,鉴赏资源所占比重(81.4%)最大,其次是情感资源和判断资源。(5)积极的鉴赏资源主导“方法”部分,主要通过形容词来实现。

    本论文拓宽了评价理论在语篇分析中的应用,丰富了广告语篇的研究,除此之外,还对广告语篇的编写提供了一定的指导。

参考文献:

[1] Austin, J.L. How to Do Things with Words[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975

[2] Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essay [M]. Eds. by M. Holquist. Trans. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Texas: University of Texas Press, 1981/2004.

[3] Barton, M. Evidential, argumentation, and epistemological stance[M]. College English 55:745-769, 1993

[4] Beaugtande, R. And W. Dressler. Introduction to Text Linguistics[M]: London: Longman

[5] Besnier, N. Reported Speech and Affect on Nukulaelae Atoll[M]. Hill and Irvine: 161-81, 1993

[6] Biber, D. & E. Finegan. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect[M]. Text 9 (1): 93-124, 1989

[7] Biber, D. & E. Finegan. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Process[M]. 1:1-34

[8] Bloor, T. & M. Bloor. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2001

[9] Christie, F. & Martin, J.R. (eds). Genres and Institutions: Social Process in the Workplace and School[M], London, Cassell, 1997.

[10] Davies, F. The Function of the Interpersonal in Written Text[M]. Available at:www.liv.ac.uk, 2004

[11] Hoey, M.P. On the Surface of Discourse[M]. London; Allen and Unwin, 1983.

[12] Jordan, M.P. Rhetoric of Everyday English Tests[M], London: Allen and Unwin, 1984.

[13] McCarthy, M. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

[14] Cook, G. The Discourse of Advertising [M]. London: Routledge, 1992

[15] Dyer, G. Advertising as Communication [M]. London: Methune, 1982.

[16] Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Function Grammar(2nd ed.) [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1985/1994/2004

[17] Halliday, M.A.K. Language, Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning[M]. Sydney: Edward Arnold, 1978

[18] Hoey, M.P. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis [M]. London: Routledge, 2001.

[19] Hood, S. Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing [D]. Unpublished phD Thesis, University of Technology, 2004

[20] Hunston, S. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse [A].// in Coulthard, M. (eds.). Advances in Written Text Analysis [C]. London: Routledge, 1994.

[21] Hyland, K. Writing without Conviction: Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 433-54

[22] Labov, W. Sociolinguistic pattern [M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.

[23] Leech, G. N. Language in advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain [M]. London: Longman, 1996.

[24] Martin, J.R.& D. Rose. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause [M]. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2007.

[25] Martin, J.R.& P.R.P. White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005

[26] Martin, J.R. Beyond exchange: appraisal system in English [A]. // in S. Huston and G Thompson (eds). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000

[27] Martin, J.R. English Text: System and structure [M]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1992.

[28] Martin, J.R. Sense and Sensibility: texturing evaluation [A]. In J. Foley (eds.). Language, Education and Discourse [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992/2004.

[29] Moriarty, S. Advertising: Principle and Practice [M]. St-Petersburg Press, 1999.

[30] Pandya, L.H. English Language in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Indian Press Advertising [M]. Delhi, India: Ajanta Publications, 1977

[31] Penkema, J. Introduction to Discourse Studies [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2009.

[32] Tanaka, K. Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertising in Britain and Japan [M]. London: Routledge, 1994

[33] Thompson, G. & S. Hunston. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000

[34] Thompson, G. Introducing Functional Gramma [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language and Teaching Research Press, 2002.

[35] Van Dijk, T.A. Macrostructure: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structure in Discourses, Interaction and Cognition[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.

[36] Van Dijk, T.A. Text and Context [M]. London: Longman, 1977.

[37] Vestergaard, T. & K. Schroder. The language of advertising [M]. Oxford and New York: Wiley Blackwell, 1985.

[38]White,P.R.R.Appraisal Outline. http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/index.html, 2001

[39] Winter, E.O. A Clause-relational Approach to English Texts: A Study of Some Predictive Lexical Items in Written Discourse [J]. Instructional Science, 1977,(6): 1-92

[40] 陈淑芳.评价系统与词汇产出[D],山东外语教学第6期:28-30,2002

[41] 胡壮鳞、朱永生、张德禄、李战子.系统功能语言学概论[M]。北京:北京大学出版社,2005

[42] 黄国文.语篇分析概要[M]。长沙:湖南教育出版社,1988.

[43] 黄国文.语篇分析的理论与实践[M]。上海:上海外语教育出版社,2001.

[44] 黄国文.美容广告中的“问题-解决办法”语篇模式[J].解放军外语学院学报,1997,(4)1-6.

[45]黄国文.从广告语篇看会话含蓄[M]。广州:中山大学外国语学院出版社,1996

[46] 李战子.话语的人际意义研究[M].上海:上海外语教学出版社,2002.

[47] 李战子.评价理论:在话语分析中的应用和问题[J].外语研究,2004,(5):1-5

[48] 杨洛西.对化妆品广告人际意义的研究[D].华中师范大学硕士学位论文,2006

[49]杨信彰.语篇中的评价性手段[J].外语与外语教学,2003,(1):3-7.

[50]刘丽.英汉广告语篇组织模式比较研究[D].河南大学硕士学位,2009.

[51]刘世铸.评价的语言学特征[J].山东外语教学,2007,(7):12-16.

[52]刘颖.从评价体系看商业评价中态度的实现[D].上海外国语大学博士学位论文,2007

[53]张韧.对英文报纸书评的评价性研究[D].上海外国语大学博士学位论文,2009

中图分类号:

 H314    

馆藏号:

 H314/2598/2014    

备注:

 403-西院分馆博硕论文库;203-余家头分馆博硕论文库    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式